Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. Pharmacy

Scientific and practical quarterly peer-reviewed journal

 

ISSN 2712-9330 (Online)

  • Continuous numbering: 8
  • Pages: 4-11
  • Share:

Heading: Original Articles

Aim of the study. Assess the diagnostic capabilities of detecting microorganisms in the wild ejaculate and sediment ejaculate.
Materials and methods. 42 male volunteers were examined, aged 28 to 69, who were married and had children. Men applied for a preventive examination and to exclude asymptomatic male accessory gland infections. All patients had no active complaints characteristic of inflammatory diseases of the genitourinary tract. The study of the wild ejaculate and sediment ejaculate was performed by PCR real-time on DT-96 amplifiers (NPO DNA-Technology LLC, Russia) using the Androflor? test.
Results. The value of the total bacterial mass in the sediment of the ejaculate is not statistically significantly higher compared to the wild ejaculate (p > 0.05). Candida spp. was statistically significantly more common in semen sediment (p < 0.05). In the sediment of the ejaculate were more often identified Enterobacteriaceae spp. / Enterococcus spp., Haemophilus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Bacteroides spp. / Porphyromonas spp. / Prevotella spp. and Anaerococcus spp. (p > 0.05). In 11.9 % of observations, in the absence of bacteria in the wild ejaculate, microorganisms in low titers were identified in sediment ejaculate.
Conclusion. According to the data obtained, the performance of the biological sample of the ejaculate sediment is higher compared to the sample of the wild ejaculate. The proposed modification of the preanalytical laboratory stage of the PCR technique, namely the diagnosis of ejaculate sediment using PCR real-time with the Androflor? test, makes it possible to more accurately determine pathogens, including those persisting in the form of biofilms in male accessory gland, even at low concentrations.
Denis G. Pochernikov – MD, PhD, Associate Professor Department of Faculty Surgery and Urology, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Ivanovo State Medical Academy” of the Ministry of Healthcare, Ivanovo, Russian Federation. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Nikita T. Postovoytenko – urologist-andrologist, The ?Mother and Child? Vladimir clinic, Vladimir, Russian Federation. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Zhanna Yu. Davidova – MD, PhD, Head of the International School of Cytology and Medical School of Innovations, Moscow, Russian Federation; Head of the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Podolsk Diagnostic Center, Podolsk, Russian Federation. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
1. Zorina VV. Osnovy` polimeraznoj cepnoj reakcii: Metodicheskoe posobie. Moscow: OOO ?DNK Texnologiya?; 2019. 150 p. (in Russ).
2. Pochernikov DG, Sapozhkova ZhYu. Tendencii ispol`zovaniya PCzR v obsledovanii muzhchin na infekcii peredayushhiesya polovy`m putem. Laboratornaya i klinicheskaya medicina. Farmaciya. 2022;2(3):18-26. DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2022.03.pp.018-026 (in Russ).
3. Boeri L, Pederzoli F, Capogrosso P, et al. Semen infections in men with primary infertility in the real-life set-ting. Fertil Steril. 2020Jun;113(6):1174-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.034
4. Schuppe HC, Pilatz A, Hossain H, et al. Urogenital Infection as a Risk Factor for Male Infertility. DtschArztebl Int. 2017May12;114(19):339-46. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0339
5. Altm?e S, Franasiak JM, M?ndar R. The seminal microbiome in health and disease. NatRev Urol. 2019Dec;16(12):703-21. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0250-y
6. Alyaeva YuG, Gly`bochko PV, Pushkarya DYu, editors. Urologiya. Rossijskie klinicheskie rekomendacii. Moscow: Medforum; 2018. 544 p. (in Russ).
7. Shhepleva PA, editor. Andrologiya dlya urologov. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. 2-e izdanie, ispravlennoe i dopol?nennoe. Moscow; Medkongress: 2021. 420 p. (in Russ).
8. Benelli A, Hossain H, Pilatz AM, et al. Prostatitis and its Management. European Urology Supplements. 2017;16:132-7.
9. Voroshilina ES, Zornikov DL, Panacheva EA. Sravnitel`noe issledovanie mikrobioty` e`yakulyata meto-dom kolichestvennoj PCzR i kul`tural`ny`m metodom. Vestnik RGMU. 2019;1:44-49. (in Russ). DOI: 10.24075/vrgmu.2019.009
10. Pochernikov DG, Postovojtenko NT, Strel`nikov AI. Sravnitel`ny`j analiz kul`tural`nogo i molekulyarno-geneticheskogo metodov v issledovanii mikrobioty` e`yaku?lyata pri muzhskoj infertil`nosti. Andrologiya i genital`naya xirurgiya. 2019;20(2):40-47. (in Russ). https://doi.org/?10.17650/2070-9781-2019-20-2-40-47
11. Borovecz SYu. Diagnosticheskaya znachimost` issledovaniya mikroflory` e`yakulyata u bol`ny`x xroni-cheskim bakterial`ny`m prostatitom metodom PCR-RT ?Androflor?. Urologicheskie vedomosti. 2019;9(1S):22-23. (in Russ).
12. Sapozhkova Z, Kasoyan K, Kovalchuk E, et al. Sperm Sediment Cytology: A New Technique for Diagnos-ing Occult Urologic Infections. ActaCytologica. 2017;61(3):247-51. (in Russ). DOI: 10.1159/000469653
13. Capozhkova ZhYu, Milovanova GA, Pochernikov DG, et al. Diagnosticheskie vozmozhnosti issledovaniya osadka e`yakulyata s pomoshh`yu amplifikacii nukleinovy`x kislot metodom polimerazno-cepnoj reakcii v rezhime real`nogo vremeni i mikrobiologicheskogo issledovaniya pri poiske prichin narusheniya muzhskoj reproduktivnoj funkcii. Medicinskie texnologii. Ocenka i vy`bor. 2022;44(2):62-71. (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20224402162
14. Sapozhkova ZhYu, Pochernikov DG, Galkina IS. Rol` citologii osadka e`yakulyata i PCzR-diagnostiki v poiske vozmozhnoj prichiny` muzhskogo besplodiya i rannejonkopatologii. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2019;4(Suppl):75-76. (in Russ). [Sapozhkova ZY, Pochernikov DG, Gal-kina IS. Infectious and non-infectious findings in infertile men with asymptomatic chronic prostatitis: sperm sediment cytology vs DNA screening. ActaCytologica. 2019;63(suppl 1):89. (in Russ).]
15. Huang Q, Chen D, Du C, et al. Highly multiplex PCR assays by coupling the 5'-flap endonuclease activity of Taq DNA polymerase and molecular beacon reporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(9):e2110672119.
16. Bhadra S, Maranhao AC, Paik I, et al. One-Enzyme Reverse Transcription qPCR Using Taq DNA Pol-ymerase. Biochemistry. 2020Dec15;59(49):4638-45. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00778
17. Turvey MW, Gabriel KN, Lee W, et al. Single-molecule Taq DNA polymerase dynamics. Sci Adv. 2022Mar11;8(10):eabl3522. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl3522
18. Mazzoli S. Biofilms in chronic bacterial prostati-tis (NIH-II) and in prostatic calcifications. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010Aug;59(3):337-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00659.x
19. Gupta P, Sarkar S, Das B, et al. Biofilm, patho-genesis and prevention a journey to break the wall: a review. Arch Microbiol. 2016Jan;198(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00203-015-1148-6
20. Nahar S, Mizan MFR, Ha AJ, et al. Advances and Future Prospects of Enzyme-Based Biofilm Prevention Approaches in the Food Industry. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018Nov;17(6):1484-502. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12382
21. Trizna EYu, Bajdamshina DR, Viniczkij AA, et al. Vliyanie in vitro izolirovannogo i sochetannogo s anti-bakterial`ny`mi sredstvami primeneniya bovgialuronidazy` azoksimer na celostnost` bakterial`noj bioplenki i zhizne-sposobnost` mikroorganizmov. E`ksperimental`naya i klinicheskaya farmakologiya. 2020;83(2):38-44. (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.30906/0869-2092-2020-83-2-38-44
22. Тrizna E, Baidamshina D, Gorshkova A, et al. Improving the Efficacy of Antimicrobials against Biofilm-Embedded Bacteria Using Bovine Hyaluronidase Azoximer (Longidaza?). Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13111740
23. Kul`chavenya EV, Shevchenko SYu, Cheredni-chenko AG, et al. Novy`e vozmozhnosti primeneniya gialuro?nidazy` pri xronicheskom prostatite. Urologiya. 2020;3:56-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2020.3.56-62
24. Czukanov AYu, Saty`baldin DO, Semikina SP. Povy`shenie rezul`tativnosti mikrobiologicheskogo issledo-vaniya e`yakulyata pri diagnostike prichin muzhskogo besplodiya. Urologiya. 2019;6:26-30. (in Russ). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2019.6.26-30

The article can be purchased
electronic!

PDF format

700 руб

DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2023.02.pp.004-011
Article type: Research Article
Make a request

Keywords

Use the reference below to cite the publication

Pochernikov DG, Postovoitenko NT, Davidova ZhYu. The benefits from update laboratory preanalytical stage in PCR on the way to identify occult urological infections in male. Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. Pharmacy. 2023;3(2):4-11. (In Russ). DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2023.02.pp.004-011