БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ОБРАЗЦЫ ДЛЯ ЦИТОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ ДИАГНОСТИКИ ОПУХОЛЕЙ ЛЕГКОГО

Андрей Андреевич Киреев – канд. мед. наук, врач клинической лабораторной диагностики клинико-диагностической лаборатории ГБУЗ ?Городская клиническая больница имени С.С. Юдина Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы?; ассистент кафедры клинической лабораторной диагностики с курсом лабораторной иммунологии ФГБОУ ДПО РМАНПО МЗ РФ, Москва, Россия. E-mail: Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.
Константин Владимирович Щетинин – врач-онколог, заместитель главного врача по организационно-методической работе ГАУЗ ?Оренбургский областной клинический онкологический диспансер?, Оренбург, Россия. E-mail: Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.

1. Лактионов К.К., Артамонова Е.В., Борисова Т.Н., и др. Злокачественное новообразование бронхов и легкого // Современная Онкология. 2021. Т.23, №3. С. 369–402. DOI: 10.26442/18151434.2021.3.201048
2. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О., ред. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2021 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена филиал ФГБУ ?НМИЦ радиологии? Минздрава России; 2022. илл. 252 с. ISBN 978-5-85502-280-3.
3. Григорук О.Г., Пупкова Е.Э., Базулина Л.М., Лазарев А.Ф. Использование цитологического материала при диагностике рака легкого // Злокачественные опухоли. 2017. Т.7, №4. С. 13–20. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2017-7-4-13-20
4. Sareen R., Pandey C.L. Lung malignancy: Diagnostic accuracies of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and fine needle aspiration cytology // Lung India. 2016. Vol. 33, N6. P. 635–41. DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.192882
5. Мартиросова К.М., Жандарова Л.Ф., Матвеева О.В. Возможности цитологического метода исследования в диагностике опухолей легкого // Medicus. 2020. Т.4, №34. С. 32–40.
6. Савостикова М.В., Фурминская Е.Ю., Елеубаева Ж.Б. Современный подход в цитологической диагностике опухо?лей легких // Онкология и радиология Казахстана. 2017. Т.3, №45. С. 18–24.
7. Савостикова М.В., Федосеева Е.С., Фурминская Е.Ю. Современная цитоморфологическая диагностика опухолей легких // Новости клинической цитологии России. 2018. Т.22, №3–4. С. 3–7.
8. Chen C.C., Bai C.H., Lee K.Y., et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of bronchial brushing cytology in lung cancer: A meta-analysis // Cancer Cytopathol. 2021. Vol. 129, N9. P. 739–749. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22436
9. Nicholson A.G., Tsao M.S., Beasley M.B., et al. The 2021 WHO classification of lung tumors: Impact of advances since 2015 // J Thorac Oncol. 2022. Vol. 17, N3. P. 362–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.003
10. Fassunke J., Engels M., Meemboor S., Buettner R. Zytopathologie und molekulare Diagnostik von nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinomen (NSCLC) [Cytopathology and molecular diagnostics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)] // Inn Med (Heidelb). 2022. Vol. 63, N7. P. 694–699. German. DOI: 10.1007/s00108-022-01365-1
11. Layfield L.J., Esebua M. A modified Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting respiratory cytology specimens: Implications for estimates of malignancy risk and diagnostic accuracy // Diagn Cytopathol. 2021. Vol. 49, N11. P. 1167–1172. DOI: 10.1002/dc.24840
12. Johnston W.W., Elson C.E. Respiratory tract. In: Bibbo M, editor. Comprehensive cytopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders Company; 1997.
13. McLean A.E.B., Barnes D.J., Troy L.K. Diagnosing lung cancer: The complexities of obtaining a tissue diagnosis in the era of minimally invasive and personalised medicine // J Clin Med. 2018. Vol. 7, N7. P. 163. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7070163
14. Арсеньев А.И., Нефедова А.В., Ганеев А.А., и др. Комбинированная ранняя диагностика рака легких определением состава выдыхаемого воздуха неселективным методом анализа летучих органических соединений с использованием металлооксидных сенсоров с перекрестной чувствительностью и цитологическим исследованием мокроты // Вопросы онкологии. 2020. Т.66, №4. С. 381–384.
15. Schreiber G., McCrory D.C. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence // Chest. 2003. Vol. 123. Suppl1. P. 115S–128S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.115s
16. Tomar V., Vijay N., Nuwal P., Dixit R. Comparative study of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and FNAC in diagnosing malignant neoplasms of lungs // J Cytol. 2016. Vol. 33, N4. P. 210–213. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.190448
17. Denley H., Singh N., Clelland C.A. Transthoracic fine needle aspiration cytology of lung for suspected malignancy: an audit of cytological findings with histopathological correlation // Cytopathology. 1997. Vol. 8, N4. P. 223–229. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1997.5482054.x
18. Ali M.S., Trick W., Mba B.I., et al. Radial endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Respirology. 2017. Vol. 22, N3. P. 443–453. DOI: 10.1111/resp.12980
19. Maghfoor I., Perry M.C. Lung cancer // Ann Saudi Med. 2005. Vol. 25, N1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2005.1
20. Струнина А.А., Соколов Д.В., Соколов В.В., Волченко Н.Н., Кашин С.В. Современные подходы к диагностике предопухолевой патологии и раннего рака легкого // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2018. №3. С. 27–32. DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20183227-32
21. Maghfoor I., Perry M.C. Lung cancer // Ann Saudi Med. 2005. Vol. 25, N1. P. 1–12. DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2005.1
22. Berlin N.I. Overview of the NCI cooperative early lung cancer detection program // Cancer. 2000. Vol. 89. Suppl 11. P. 2349–2351. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2349::aid-cncr6>3.3.co;2-w
23. Fontana R.S., Sanderson D.R., Taylor W.F., et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study // Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984. Vol. 130, N4. P. 561–565. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.4.561
24. Frost J.K., Ball W.C. Jr, Levin M.L., et al. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Johns Hopkins study // Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984. Vol. 130, N4. P. 549–554. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.4.549
25. Doria-Rose V.P., Marcus P.M., Szabo E., Tockman M.S., Melamed M.R., Prorok P.C. Randomized controlled trials of the efficacy of lung cancer screening by sputum cytology revisited: a combined mortality analysis from the Johns Hopkins Lung Project and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Lung Study // Cancer. 2009. Vol. 115, N21. P. 5007–5017. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24545
26. Manser R.L., Irving L.B., Byrnes G., Abramson M.J., Stone C.A., Campbell D.A. Screening for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials // Thorax. 2003. Vol. 58, N9. P. 784–789. DOI: 10.1136/thorax.58.9.784
27. Flehinger B.J., Melamed M.R., Zaman M.B., Heelan R.T., Perchick W.B., Martini N. Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering study // Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984. Vol. 130, N4. P. 555–560. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.4.555
28. Petty T.L. Sputum cytology for the detection of early lung cancer // Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003. Vol. 9, N4. P. 309–312. DOI: 10.1097/00063198-200307000-00011
29. Neumann T., Meyer M., Patten F.W., et al. Premalignant and malignant cells in sputum from lung cancer patients // Cancer. 2009. Vol. 117, N6. P. 473–481. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20052
30. Schreiber G., McCrory D.C. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence // Chest. 2003. Vol. 123. Suppl 1. P. 115S–128S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.115s
31. Schreiber G., McCrory D.C. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence // Chest. 2003. Vol. 123. Suppl 1. P. 115S–128S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.115s
32. Roby T.J., Swan G.E., Sorensen K.W., Hubbard G.A., Schumann G.B. Discriminant analysis of lower respiratory tract components associated with cigarette smoking, based on quantitative sputum cytology // Acta Cytol. 1990. Vol. 34, N2. P. 147–154.
33. Mehta A.C., Marty J.J., Lee F.Y. Sputum cytology // Clin Chest Med. 1993. Vol. 14, N1. P. 69–85.
34. Schumann G.B., Roby T.J., Swan G.E., Sorensen K.W. Quantitative sputum cytologic findings in 109 nonsmokers // Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989. Vol. 139, N3. P. 601–603. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.3.601
35. Kennedy T.C., Proudfoot S.P., Franklin W.A., et al. Cytopathological analysis of sputum in patients with airflow obstruction and significant smoking histories // Cancer Res. 1996. Vol. 56, N20. P. 4673–4678.
36. Breuer R.H., Pasic A., Smit E.F., et al. The natural course of preneoplastic lesions in bronchial epithelium // Clin Cancer Res. 2005. Vol. 11, N2 Pt 1. P. 537–543.
37. Kennedy T.C., Franklin W.A., Prindiville S.A., et al. High prevalence of occult endobronchial malignancy in high risk patients with moderate sputum atypia // Lung Cancer. 2005. Vol. 49, N2. P. 187–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.02.009
38. Byers T., Wolf H.J., Franklin W.A., et al. Sputum cytologic atypia predicts incident lung cancer: defining latency and histologic specificity // Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008. Vol. 17, N1. P. 158–162. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0436
39. Hogea S.P., Tudorache E., Pescaru C., Marc M., Oancea C. Bronchoalveolar lavage: role in the evaluation of pulmonary interstitial disease // Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020. Vol. 14, N11. P. 1117–1130. DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1806063
40. Meyer K.C. Bronchoalveolar lavage as a diagnostic tool // Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2007. Vol. 28, N5. P. 546–560. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-991527
41. Meyer K.C., Raghu G. Bronchoalveolar lavage for the evaluation of interstitial lung disease: is it clinically useful? // Eur Respir J. 2011. Vol. 38, N4. P. 761–769. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00069509
42. Rao S., Rao S., Lal A., Barathi G., Dhanasekar T., Duvuru P. Bronchial wash cytology: A study on morphology and morphometry // J Cytol. 2014. Vol. 31, N2. P. 63–67. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.138664
43. Domagala-Kulawik J. The relevance of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analysis for lung cancer patients // Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020. Vol. 14, N3. P. 329–337. DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1708720
44. Truong L.D., Underwood R.D., Greenberg S.D., McLarty J.W. Diagnosis and typing of lung carcinomas by cytopathologic methods. A review of 108 cases // Acta Cytol. 1985. Vol. 29, N3. P. 379–384.
45. Gray W., editor. Diagnostic cytopathology. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier’s Health Sciences; 2010. 930 p.
46. Zavala D.C., Richardson R.H., Mukerjee P.K., Rossi N.P., Bedell G.N. Use of the bronchofiberscope for bronchial brush biopsy. Diagnostic results and comparison with other brushing techniques // Chest. 1973. Vol. 63, N6. P. 889–892. DOI: 10.1378/chest.63.6.889
47. Tomar V., Vijay N., Nuwal P., Dixit R. Comparative study of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and FNAC in diagnosing malignant neoplasms of lungs // J Cytol. 2016. Vol. 33, N4. P. 210–213. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.190448
48. Gaur D.S., Thapliyal N.C., Kishore S., Pathak V.P. Efficacy of broncho-alveolar lavage and bronchial brush cytology in diagnosing lung cancers // J Cytol. 2007. Vol. 24. P. 73–77.
49. Liam C.K., Pang Y.K., Poosparajah S. Diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopic procedures in lung cancer patients according to tumour location // Singapore Med J. 2007. Vol. 48, N7. P. 625–631.
50. Karahalli E., Yilmaz A., T?rker H., Ozvaran K. Usefulness of various diagnostic techniques during fiberoptic bronchoscopy for endoscopically visible lung cancer: should cytologic examinations be performed routinely? // Respiration. 2001. Vol. 68, N6. P. 611–614. DOI: 10.1159/000050581
51. Reynolds J.P., Voss J.S., Brankley S.M., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of bronchial brush cytology and the added value of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors // Cytojournal. 2014. Vol. 11. P. 32. DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.146120
52. Zakowski M.F. Cytology nomenclature and 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung cancer // Cancer Cytopathol. 2016. Vol. 124, N2. P. 81–88. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21628
53. Layfield L.J., Pearson L., Walker B.S., White S.K., Schmidt R.L. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for discrimination of squamous cell carcinoma from Adeno-carcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Acta Cytol. 2018. Vol. 62, N5–6. P. 318–326. DOI: 10.1159/000493942
54. Saad R.S., Silverman J.F. Respiratory cytology: differential diagnosis and pitfalls // Diagn Cytopathol. 2010. Vol. 38, N4. P. 297–307. DOI: 10.1002/dc.21205
55. Saha A., Kumar K., Choudhuri M.K. Computed tomography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of thoracic mass lesions: A study of 57 cases // J Cytol. 2009. Vol. 26, N2. P. 55–59. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.55222
56. Jindal S.K. Pulmonary Neoplasms. In: JN Pande, editor. Respiratory medicine in the tropics, 1st ed. Delhi: Oxford University press; 1998. P. 439–450
57. Larscheid R.C., Thorpe P.E., Scott W.J. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: a comprehensive review of its current role in the diagnosis and treatment of lung tumors // Chest. 1998. Vol. 114, N3. P. 704–709. DOI: 10.1378/chest.114.3.704
58. Chraba?ska M., ?roda M., Kiczmer P., Drozdzowska B. Lung cancer cytology: can any of the cytological methods replace histopathology? // J Cytol. 2020. Vol. 37, N3. P. 117–121. DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_168_19
59. Yang M.C., Liu W.T., Wang C.H., et al. Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in peripheral lung cancers // J Formos Med Assoc. 2004. Vol. 103, N2. P. 124–129.
60. Chao T.Y., Chien M.T., Lie C.H., Chung Y.H., Wang J.L., Lin M.C. Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration increases the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomized trial // Chest. 2009. Vol. 136, N1. P. 229–236. DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0577
61. Wang J.F., Baidoo C., Collins B.T. Improved efficacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in comparison to endobronchial ultrasound-guided miniforceps biopsy // Acta Cytol. 2014. Vol. 58, N2. P. 125–130. DOI: 10.1159/000357358
62. Crapanzano J.P., Saqi A. Pitfalls in pulmonary cytopathology // Diagn Cytopathol. 2011. Vol. 39, N2. P. 144–154. DOI: 10.1002/dc.21396
63. Sareen R., Pandey C.L. Lung malignancy: Diagnostic accuracies of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and fine needle aspiration cytology // Lung India. 2016. Vol. 33, N6. P. 635–641. DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.192882
64. Rohtagi S., Khan L., Pantola C., Kumar A., Singh P.K. Correlationof fine needle aspiration cytology with bronchoalveolar lavage and brush smear cytology in pulmonary lesions // J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014. Vol. 3. P. 6957–6964.
65. Волченко Н.Н., Борисова О.В., Мельникова В.Ю., и др. Срочная морфологическая диагностика в онкологии. Онкология // Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2020. Т.9, №1. С. 5–13. DOI: 10.17116/onkolog202090115
66. Sugiyama T., Tajiri T., Fujita H., et al. Diagnostic utility and pitfalls of intraoperative pulmonary imprint cytology based on final pathological diagnoses // Cytopathology. 2019. Vol. 30, N1. P. 74–81. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12649
67. Yuan M., Wang Y., Yin W., Xiao Y., Hu M., Hu Y. Efficacy of rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) by a pul-monologist in determining specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in interventional diagnosis of lung lesions // J Int Med Res. 2021. Vol. 49, N2. P. 300060520982687. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520982687
68. Wang H., Wei N., Tang Y., et al. The utility of rapid on-site evaluation during bronchoscopic biopsy: A 2-year respiratory endoscopy central experience // Biomed Res Int. 2019. Vol. 2019. P. 5049248. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5049248
69. Jain D., Allen T.C., Aisner D.L., et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirations for the diagnosis of lung cancer: A perspective from members of the pulmonary pathology society // Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018. Vol. 142, N2. P. 253–262. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0114-SA
70. Pisapia P., Malapelle U., Troncone G. Liquid biopsy and lung cancer // Acta cytologica. 2019. Vol. 63, N6. P. 489–496. DOI: 10.1159/000492710