Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. Pharmacy

Scientific and practical quarterly peer-reviewed journal

ISSN 2712-9330 (Online)

  • Continuous numbering: 13
  • Pages: 11-23
  • Share:

Heading: Original Articles

Introduction: Numerous studies have proven that Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disease condition that has been the focus of attention in the global medical community due to its prevalence and the unsatisfactory treatment outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to compare the microbiota of prostate secretions (PSM) between patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) and chronic abacterial prostatitis (CAP) of category IIIa.
Material and methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at the SM Clinic Medical Center in Moscow from 2018 to 2023. 159 male patients with prostatitis-like symptoms aged 25 to 50 were selected. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included patients with CBP (n = 38) and group 2 included patients with category IIIa CAP with clinical manifestations of chronic prostatitis (n = 121). The study of PSM microbiota was performed using the method of nucleic acid amplification (MANC) with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using the Androflor test (MANC-PCR-RT/Androflor), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using the method of microbial mass spectrometry (MSMM).
Results: A comparative analysis of the absolute indices of PSM microbiota based on MSMM data revealed that patients with CBP had a higher level of coccal and bacillary microbiota, as well as enterobacteria (of transient flora), along with the low level of anaerobic and resident microorganisms compared to a great number of patients with CAP stage IIIa (p < 0.05).
A comparative analysis of relative indices of PSM microbiota based on MSMM data showed that patients with CBP had higher levels of coccal microbiota and gram (–) bacillus (of transient flora and normally not found in healthy individuals), as well as significantly lower levels (p < 0.05) of anaerobic and resident microorganism compared to patients in the CAP category IIIa group.
Conclusion: The study found that patients with CAP had a higher microbial load of anaerobic and resident microorganisms. The patients with CBP had an increase in the levels of the most pathogenic forms of microorganisms, including transient and enterobacterial species.
Zieratsho A. Kadyrov – MD, professor, the head of the department of endoscopic urology and ultrasound diagnostic of faculty of continuous medical education of medical institute in ‘Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia’, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Shota V. Ramishvili – postgraduate student of the department of endoscopic urology and ultrasound diagnostic of faculty of continuous medical education of medical institute in ‘Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia’, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Vladimir S. Stepanov– assistant of endoscopic urology and ultrasound guidance department of faculty of postgraduate education of faculty of medical institute in ‘Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia’, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Aleksei V. Ignatev – postgraduate student of the department of endoscopic urology and ultrasound diagnostic of faculty of continuous medical education of medical institute in ‘Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia’, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Shakro G. Mashaneishvili – postgraduate student of the department of endoscopic urology and ultrasound diagnostic of faculty of continuous medical education of medical institute in ‘Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia’, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: -
1. Alyaev YuG, Glybochko PV, Pushkar' DYu. Urologiya: Rossiyskie klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. (In Russ).
2. Apolihin OI, Komarova VA, Nikushina AA, et al. Prostate diseases in the Russian Federation: statistical data for 2008–2017. Experimental and clinical urology. 2019;2:4-13. (In Russ). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2019-11-2-4-12
3. Pendegast HJ, Leslie SW, Rosario DJ. Chronic Prostatitis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Men. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2024. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2002.00481.x
4. Tikhonov IV, Tityaev II, Kasyanov DS, et al. The effectiveness of a systematic approach in the complex treatment of congestive prostatitis with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2022;23(3):109-14. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2022-23-3-109-114
5. Bozhedomov VA. Prostatit: old and new. Moskovskiy urolog. 2023;1:12-13. (In Russ).
6. Bozhedomov VA. Modern opportunities for the treatment of chronic prostatitis. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2016;17(3):10-22. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2016-17-3-10-22
7. Kadyrov ZA., Stepanov VS., Ramishvili ShV, et al. Diagnostics of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2019;20(3):36-42. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2019-20-3-36-42
8. Kogan MI, Naboka YL, Ismailov RS. Prostatic secretion microbiota: a comparative analysis of the сhronical prostatitis II and IIIA category. Urologiia. 2020;2:16-22. (In Russ). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2020.2.16-22
9. Magistro G, Wagenlehner FME, Pilatz A. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Urologie. 2023;62(6):590-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-023-02089-2
10. Kadyrov ZA, Faniev MV, Ramishvili ShV, et al. Microbiota of prostate secretion in patients with chronic abacterial prostatitis. Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2024;25(1):73-86. (In Russ). DOI: 10.62968/2070-9781-2024-25-1-73-86
11. Osipov GA, Rodionov GG. Microenvironment in human health and disease by mass spectrometry of microbial markers. Medicо-Biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2013;(2):43-53. (In Russ). DOI: 10.25016/2541-7487-2013-0-2-43-53
12. Kogan MI, Ibishev KhS, Naboka YuL, et al. Extended culture study as a keypoint to rethinking antibiotic therapy for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Urologiia. 2023;1:5-11. (In Russ). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2023.1.5-11
13. Pochernikov DG, Pustovoitenko NT, Davidova ZhYu. The effectiveness of modification of the preanalytical laboratory stage of PCR in order to identify hidden urogenital infections in men. Laboratory and clinical medicine. Pharmacy. 2023;3(2):4-11. (In Russ). DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2023.02.pp.004-011
14. Sapozhkova ZhYu, Milovanova GA, Pochernikov DG, et al. Diagnostic capabilities of ejaculate sediment examination with the help of nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction and microbiologic examination in searching for causes of male reproductive disfunction. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2022;44(2):62-71. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/medtech20224402162
15. Davidova ZhYu, Chelikova GA. The role of an interdisciplinary approach in the search for effective diagnostic algorithms in the laboratory examination of patients with diseases of the male accessory gonads. Laboratory and clinical medicine. Pharmacy. 2024;4(1):17-24. (In Russ). DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2024.01.pp.017-024
16. Song W, Gao J, Huang J, et al. Is type III prostatitis also associated with bacterial infection? Front Cell Infec Microbiol. 2023;13:1189081. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1189081
17. Wang S, Zang M, Yang X, et al. Gut microbiome in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: profiling and its predictive significance. World J Urol. 2023;41(11):3019-3026. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04587-6
18. Lobel B, Rodriguez A. Chronic prostatitis: what we know, what we do not know, and what we should do! World J Urol. 2003;21:57-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0336-1
19. Pisanov RV, Shipko ES, Duvanova OV, et al. Identification of microorganisms using gas chromatography-mass-spectrometry. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2020;97(4):356-62. (In Russ). DOI: 10.36233/0372-9311-2020-97-4-8
20. Glukhovets BI., Khodareva AG. Analiz mikrobiotsenoza reproduktivnoy sistemy metodom khromato-mass-spektrometrii. Practical Manual. St.-Petersburg, 2016. 61 p. (In Russ).

The article can be purchased
electronic!

PDF format

700

DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2024.03.pp.011-023
Article type: Research Article
Make a request

Keywords

Use the reference below to cite the publication

Kadyrov ZA, Ramishvili ShV, Stepanov VS, Ignatev AV, Mashaneishvili ShG. Comparative analysis of microbiota of prostatic secretion in patients with chronic bacterial and abacterial prostatitis of category IIIa by mass spectrometry examination of microbial markers. Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. Pharmacy. 2024;4(3):11-23. (In Russ). DOI: 10.14489/lcmp.2024.03.pp.011-023